Session+12

=Session 12 - Judicial Review= Thursday July 21st



// __ 12.1: Respond to the statement below __ //

//**“You have been elected the new Mayor of Malden. Before leaving office, the old mayor gave jobs to several of his political friends but the paperwork hasn’t made it to the personnel office yet.**//

//** A. Should you 1) honor the jobs promised by the old mayor, or 2) cancel the jobs since they aren’t “officially” in the system yet?\ **//
=//** I would let everyone get the jobs that the mayor promised, because he has more experience. **//= = =

//** B. What are the possible negatives to denying these people their jobs? What are the possible positives to allowing them to take these jobs? **//
=//** Some possible negatives to denying these people their jobs are either they are not prepared enough or they couldnt be trust worthy. **//= =//** Some possible positives to allowing them to keep these jobs would be that they are able to keep the job or I'll give them the oportunnity and see what they are able to do. **//=

//** C. Would it make a difference if the perspective employees had worked against you in the mayoral elections? **//
=//** No, it wouldn't make a difference to me because they still have to work for me **//= = = = __**12.2: Overview of the Case and Importance**__ = What is judicial review? Is it mentioned in the Constitution? The Constitution states in

**__12.3: Hearing and Seeing the case review__**

[]
 * 1) Who was Marshall likely to side with, Marbury or Madison? Why?
 * 2) If the Court decided that Marbury was entitled to the commission, how could it be sure that the executive branch would deliver it? Does the Court have the power to force compliance? What would happen if the Court issued the writ, but the executive branch refused to comply?
 * 3) If Congress passes a law that conflicts with the Constitution, which one are we required to follow: the new law or the U.S. Constitution?


 * He would side with Marbury.
 * Yes the Court have the power to force compliance.



__**12.4: Summary:**__

If the cs does not provide for judicial review, then be able to take any case they wanted and could rule on anything , not just the Constitution.